Free library
Expert advisors
Free MT5 expert advisors — download with a free account.
Newest Profit factor Lowest drawdown Most trades Clear filters
Trend following (5)Mean reversion (3)Breakout (7)Momentum (11)Price action (33)Support and resistance (4)Session based (3)Volatility (7)Multi-timeframe (2)
Upcoming EAs
These are in testing. They show promise but have not cleared the publish gate yet — we are polishing and re-testing them, and each will join the library above once it passes. Shown openly, with the figures so far and the one thing still short, so you can see what is coming.
| EA | Family | Symbol | TF | Trades | PF | Rel. DD | Model | Still needs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PipFix SrWeeklyLevel
EA-042 |
Support and resistance | GBPUSD | H4 | 62 | 1.22 | 7.57% | 100% | trades_ge_80: measured 62 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix SmcPremiumDiscount
EA-036 |
Price action | XAUUSD | H1 | 307 | 1.14 | 9.93% | 98% | pf_ge_1_15: measured 1.140, needs >= 1.15 |
|
PipFix SmcMitigationBlock
EA-035 |
Price action | XAUUSD | M30 | 41 | 1.46 | 12.96% | 98% | trades_ge_80: measured 41 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix BosRetestVolatility
EA-022 |
Breakout | GBPUSD | H1 | 38 | 1.15 | 6.55% | 100% | trades_ge_80: measured 38 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix BosRetestStructure
EA-020 |
Breakout | XAUUSD | M30 | 28 | 2.00 | 3.57% | 98% | trades_ge_80: measured 28 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix BosRetestConsolidation
EA-019 |
Breakout | XAUUSD | M30 | 16 | 1.97 | 5.15% | 98% | trades_ge_80: measured 16 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix StochSwing
EA-014 |
Swing | EURUSD | H1 | 196 | 1.09 | 6.98% | 100% | pf_ge_1_15: measured 1.090, needs >= 1.15 |
|
PipFix RangeBounce
EA-010 |
Mean reversion | EURUSD | M30 | 49 | 1.59 | 3.42% | 100% | trades_ge_80: measured 49 trades, needs >= 80 |
|
PipFix AsianFade
EA-001 |
Mean reversion | EURUSD | M15 | 19 | 2.42 | 1.98% | 100% | trades_ge_80: measured 19 trades, needs >= 80 |
Read the drawdown and the modelling quality together. A tidy profit factor produced at low tick coverage is not evidence about the real market — the fills are largely interpolated. That is why modelling quality is a gate criterion and not a footnote.